The losing battle of the clean water act and environmental protection agency

Why wholesale repeal of environmental protections is a losing business strategy

They are used extensively for corn and soybean fields in the Raccoon River watershed, and are common on 40 percent of the farmland in Midwestern states between Iowa and Ohio. States set WQS by designating uses for the water body e.

Current uses are identified by showing that fishing, swimming, and other water uses have occurred and are suitable since November 28, This winter, the water agency had to keep its unit running for 96 days, the longest ever for that season.

The agency began to develop regulations for stormwater permit coverage but encountered resistance from industry and municipalities, and there were additional rounds of litigation. Midwest corn and soybean fields, such as those upstream from Des Moines, account for a quarter of the phosphorus and more than half of the nitrogen that enters the Gulf.

As the practice became more popular, farmers needed a way to move the drained water off their property and into streams and rivers. In subsequent amendments Congress reduced the federal proportion of the grants and in the WQA transitioned to a revolving loan program in Title VI.

Variance policy temporarily relax water quality standard and are alternatives to removing a designated use. But soon area residents discovered that by adding drainage pipes four to five feet underground, the swampland could be made incredibly fertile.

Background[ edit ] Health implications of water pollution[ edit ] Contamination of drinking water supplies can not only occur in the source water but also in the distribution system. There are 28 categories with pretreatment standards as of Low Flow policy pertains to states and tribes water quality standards that identify procedures applied to determining critical low flow conditions.

So they installed underground plumbing systems to carry water away, and their farms flourished. Nitrates dissolve in water and are difficult to remove. Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem. The Iowa Supreme Court ruled three years ago that drainage districts cannot be sued for money damages; they can only be sued to compel them to keep up their systems.

Maintained existing requirements to set water quality standards for all contaminants in surface waters. The TMDL is determined after study of the specific properties of the water body and the pollutant sources that contribute to the non-compliant status.

A nutrient criterion solely protects against nutrient over enrichment; and a sediment criterion describes conditions of contaminated and uncontaminated sediments in order to avoid undesirable effects.

Terry Branstad, a Republican in his sixth term, said as the utility geared up for the court battle this winter. The additional limitations are to be more stringent than the technology-based limitations and would require the permittee to install additional controls.

A violator may also receive up to a year in jail. Water quality standards consist of four basic elements: Iowa farmers planted more thanacres of cover crops in In extreme cases, nitrate-rich water can be fatally toxic for babies, depriving them of oxygen.

The endgame here is agricultural accountability for water quality in this state. That is, of course, why farmers apply nitrogen-heavy fertilizers in the first place.

Recognized the need for planning to address the critical problems posed by nonpoint source pollution. If the national standard is not sufficiently protective at a particular location, then water quality standards may be employed.

Technology-Based Standards Program[ edit ] Under the act EPA began to issue technology-based standards for municipal and industrial sources.

All of the drainage districts it sued are in sparsely populated areas, where farms are the only plausible source of nitrate pollution and public data show high levels of nitrates in the water. Experts say this reduces nitrate leaving farm fields by 31 percent.

In the CWA, Congress added the permit system and a requirement for technology-based effluent limitations. It is particularly frustrating, says Pat Sinicropi of the National Association of Clean Water Agencies, because reducing a pollutant such as nitrogen or phosphorus is much cheaper in the field than in a treatment plant.

If those standards indicate designated uses to be less than those currently attained, states or tribes are required to revise standards to reflect the uses thaf are actually being attained. A system of grants for construction of municipal sewage treatment plants was authorized and funded in Title II.

States that are authorized by EPA to administer the NPDES program must have authority to enforce permit requirements under their respective state laws. Because of differences in its geography, economy and water supply, Cedar Rapids can afford to be patient.

History of the Clean Water Act

In Maryland and other Mid-Atlantic states, efforts to clean up the Chesapeake Bay have increasingly focused on stormwater runoff in communities far upstream from the bay.

By comparison, urban areas contribute 12 percent of the phosphorus and 9 percent of the nitrogen that runs into it. This new funding strategy addressed water quality needs by building on EPA-state partnerships.

Farmers and Cities Play the Water Pollution Blame Game

That system was not effective, and there was no permit system in place to enforce the requirements. Industrial and other private facilities are required to finance their own treatment improvements on the "polluter pays" principle.Sterling Suffolk Racecourse LLC Clean Water Act Settlement: U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of Justice announced that Sterling Suffolk Racecourse LLC will pay a civil penalty of $ million to resolve violations of the Clean Water Act (CWA) at its Suffolk Downs racetrack facility in Revere and East Boston, Mass.

United States Environmental Protection Agency Office Of Water (WH) EPA K August 1 The National Environmental Benefits Of The Clean Water Act Progress Made In The United States Through The Secondary Treatment Of Municipal Wastewater Some twenty years since passage of the Clean Water Act, a nationwide review shows promising results for the environment.

5 Reasons to Like the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. it helped change that by inspiring the nascent national environmental movement. The Clean Water Act of The Clean Water Act led. In fact, the Environmental Protection Agency has been tightening the screws on municipal water systems under the Clean Water Act, often requiring improvements costing billions of dollars.

In many areas, though, farm runoff is harming the environment more than city waste. Why wholesale repeal of environmental protections is a losing business strategy Water and tagged bipartisan, clean air, clean water, Congress, economy, Endangered Species Act, Environmental Protection Agency, environmental protections, EPA, ESA, Interior department.

That system is managed by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in partnership with state environmental agencies. EPA has authorized 46 states to issue permits directly to the discharging facilities.

Clean Water Act and environmental justice. Executive Order ().

Download
The losing battle of the clean water act and environmental protection agency
Rated 3/5 based on 70 review