The outcome should be judged on its merits. Side payments bribes is a real problem. Government Workers to Local Officials The first type can prove difficult to achieve, for civil servants, particularly professionals in such fields as health, education, agriculture --the very sectors that are most often decentralized-- often have considerable incentive to evade control by locally elected officials.
However, the issue becomes more difficult with respect to passive behavior. The strength of a decision should not depend on the vote.
A feasible substitute in many settings is low-wattage AM radio, which is highly local, cheap to operate, and can offer news and talk shows addressing local issues.
If people are making decisions that will then be the subject of regulation that will apply to me, I want to be able know what the exact argument was, and its counter arguments. But just as it took many decades for such efforts to make much headway in the industrial countries, so too quick results cannot be expected elsewhere.
There are tremendous values at stake as collective decisions are taken. In some countries, print media can perform this function, but generally their coverage is minimal outside larger population centers. Another aspect of transparency can be seen in the policies towards final drafts.
The reader assumes sole responsibility for the selection of these materials to achieve its intended results.
This creates incentives for rent-seeking and manipulation. It would certainly make everyone feel better, for a while. It fosters accountability in decision-making, through external and internal review. However, if the ratification process negates the intended effects of transparency, then a government may actually be worse off than it was before the procurement process began.
You find two perspectives: Government should become transparent. How much do you think exists today, in de jure bodies? Jurisdictions should evaluate their HR practices to ensure that strong human judgment is encouraged, and that those who are incapable of exercising good judgment are trained in or removed from positions of responsibility.
Given all these reasons both good and bad for opposition, it is scarcely surprising that decentralization initiatives so often run into heavy bureaucratic resistance, and designers find themselves pressured to keep significant linkages between the field and the central ministries, especially concerning such issues as postings, promotions, and salaries.
Formal redress procedures have been included as an accountability mechanism in some decentralization initiatives. It is accordingly desirable that a holder of an unknown patent is prohibited from manipulating a standard in its own interest just to create a lock-in that can subsequently be exploited in IPR licensing by that firm.
Public records, such as minutes, could indeed be kept anonymous without sacrificing much transparency.The Pros and Cons of Transparency. Transparency in standardization has important advantages. It fosters accountability in decision-making, through external and internal review.
It also helps companies, including small and medium enterprises, to make informed decisions.
However, it also has numerous disadvantages. There are. SUMMING UP: What's the proper balance in an organization between transparency and opaqueness? Many of Jim Heskett's readers would err on the side of management forthrightness.
SUMMING UP: What's the proper balance in an organization between transparency and opaqueness?
What Are the Limits of Transparency?. What are the disadvantages of e governance? Update Cancel. ad by Broadly.
Also there are some opponents of e-government that argue that online governmental transparency is suspicious because it is maintained by the governments themselves. The Information can be added or removed from the public eyes.
this day, very few.
On the Disadvantages of Transparency for Government Reflections on Some Arguments Against Transparency as a Democratic Reform Transparency has become a novel value of democracy. It has been embraced by governments and civil society as a preferred reform strategy for improving governance.
Transparency in Government Procurement: Pros and Cons 16 April John Kost Document Type: Research Note Primary Disadvantages: Written Solicitations Transparency is a positive concept, but it has a price in terms of process cost, and also in the reduced likelihood of taxpayers getting the best possible price.
The Pros & Cons of Organizational Transparency. Posted by changeleader In Drumm McNaughton. Organizational transparency is here to stay. In fact, some may argue it’s the new competitive advantage. With the digital age in full bloom, it’s never been easier or more convenient for institutions to open doors to how they think and behave.Download